Guides · Section guides

The YKI speaking section: talking to a microphone without freezing

8 min read · by the YKIReady editorial team · last reviewed 9 September 2026

Written independently of Opetushallitus. Fees, dates and requirements are checked against yki.opintopolku.fi — confirm current details there before you pay for anything.

You will not sit across from a friendly examiner. You will wear a headset in a room of other candidates, hear a prompt, get a few seconds to think, and speak into a microphone until a beep stops you. People who chat comfortably in Finnish still underperform here, purely because of the format.

How the section runs

The speaking section is a sequence of short, separate tasks played from a recording. Each task has a preparation window (often only a few seconds) and a fixed response window (typically 20 to 60 seconds, longer for the final monologue). When the response window closes, the next task begins whether you finished or not. There is no going back.

• Reacting to situations — you hear a situation ('a neighbour asks you to look after their cat next weekend') and respond in one or two natural sentences. Tests speed and appropriateness, not depth.
• Describing — a picture, a chart, your daily routine, your home town, a place you would recommend.
• Explaining or instructing — how to get somewhere, how something works, how you would solve a small practical problem.
• Opinion monologue — the longest task. You get a topic (public transport, working from home, screen time, recycling) and speak continuously, giving a view and reasons.

The three ways people lose marks

1. Silence. Long pauses while you search for the perfect word cost more than the imperfect word would have. Assessors score what they hear.
2. Self-correction loops. Restarting the same sentence three times uses your whole window and produces one fragment.
3. Under-filling. Answering a 45-second opinion task in 12 seconds gives the rater almost nothing to score, so it lands low no matter how correct it was.

The rating asks how well you communicate, not whether you produced flawless Finnish. A candidate who talks for the full window with some mistakes usually outscores one who says three perfect sentences and stops.

Tactics that work under a countdown

Use a fixed opening frame

Have a rehearsed sentence to start any opinion task while your brain catches up: 'Minun mielestäni tämä on tärkeä aihe, koska…' or 'Tässä asiassa on kaksi puolta.' It buys three seconds and it is always grammatical.

Structure everything as three beats

Opinion, reason, example. 'Mielestäni julkinen liikenne on parempi kuin oma auto. Se on halvempaa ja ympäristöystävällisempää. Itse kuljen töihin bussilla joka päivä, ja se toimii hyvin.' Three beats reliably fills 25–35 seconds and covers range, coherence and content at once.

Keep going with fillers that are real Finnish

'No, siis…', 'toisaalta…', 'esimerkiksi…', 'sanoisin, että…' — these buy thinking time while still sounding like the language. English fillers and long silences do not.

Simplify instead of stalling

If a word will not come, say the idea another way. 'Se paikka, missä ihmiset käyvät uimassa' is worth far more than eight silent seconds hunting for 'uimahalli'. Paraphrasing is a scored skill, not a failure.

A four-week drill routine

1. Record yourself. Every single practice session. Phone voice memo is fine. Speaking practice you cannot hear back is nearly worthless.
2. Set an actual timer and finish when it beeps, even mid-sentence. Learn what 45 seconds of your own Finnish feels like.
3. Do ten short reaction tasks in a row without stopping to review — this trains the switch between tasks, which is where candidates lose their rhythm.
4. Once a week, listen back to one recording and count only two things: seconds of silence, and number of different verbs used. Those two numbers move your band.
5. Speak about mundane topics aloud in daily life — what you did today, what you will cook. Fluency is built by volume, not by perfection.

Practising with a recorded, timed mock matters more here than in any other section, because the anxiety of the format is itself the obstacle. By the third rehearsal the beep stops being alarming, and that alone is often worth a band.

Frequently asked questions